Monday, 4 December 2017

Conspiracy Cuber's "New" Analysis Location of 61st Video of the Alleged UA175


 By Mark Conlon

Here's an interesting new study by 'Conspiracy Cuber' who is clarifying the location of a new video that surfaced of "Flight 175". 

Short intro from 'Conspiracy Cuber' about his new study...
Just felt like broadcasting my discovery I came across last night. I found the location of the video at 7:52 uploaded by CameraPlanet on 5/14/2016 (I accidentally said 24; it's 14) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0kgv... Filmed at 55 W 13th Street on the roof. The building holds multiple tenants (I think).
 

40 44' 11.41" N
73 59' 48.16" W
 

Altitude, about 47 meters or so.

 


A valid piece of research here showing that the actual location exists and is a "real" video, not as some disinformationists claim is fake.


Thank you for watching....



"IMPORTANT NOTICE" About Changes Regarding the Videos On My Blog


By: Mark Conlon

After swift aggressive censorship of my YouTube Channel back in October because of the research and critique of various 9/11 disinformation I exposed surrounding false "video fakery" claims by various 9/11 researchers, left me no option to use another video hosting platform to host videos for this blogsite. This took me quite a bit of time to transfer all my videos over to a new video hosting platform called Vidme. 


Unfortunately I received notice yesterday that Vidme is no longer going to be operating from 15th December 2017. 

Vidme say - "We’re sad to announce that Vidme will be shutting down on December 15th".

So a process of finding a new platform and transferring all the videos back onto my blog will have to be done and not something I can do overnight, and certainly not as quick as I did with Vidme. Due to time constraints this will be a much slower process this time around, so I hope you can appreciate if you see videos disappearing from my blog articles, it is not due to anything sinister like I believe was done with my YouTube Channel in October, something which Andrew Johnson talked about briefly to Richard D. Hall in his latest 10th Anniversary Show - Part Three. See below:


I wont be posting any new research articles this year due to this unforeseen circumstance, as I will work on getting the transition of the videos complete so the blog-site is back in normal operation again, and then will be posting new research next year. I will make brief posts though and share valid research by others to keep everyone in the loop of things. 

I hope I have your understanding and patience with this transition period. 

I would like to thank everyone personally for the support you have shown to me, and for even stopping by to read the articles, even if you don't agree with my findings. Also thanks to the three people who have decided to "Follow" my blog. Anyone interested in following my blog, please hit the "Follow Me" button at the bottom of the side-bar on the right of the page. 

And finally, I wish you all a happy seasonal break.


Mark Conlon.


 

Monday, 20 November 2017

New Book Released By: Andrew Johnson "9/11 Holding the Truth"


By Mark Conlon

This week has seen the release of a new book called '9/11 Holding The Truth' by Andrew Johnson which follows-on from his 2009 book '9/11 Finding The Truth'. 


This book is based mainly on articles that have appeared on http://www.checktheevidence.com/ since about 2006. The articles have been edited, revised and links updated. I have added chapters about my experiences in the UK 9/11 Truth Scene since I got involved in 2005, which have not been published on this website before. I have also included a couple of short chapters on some of the wider and more esoteric aspects of 9/11.The result is a 244-page 6x9 book with a cover graphic design by Nick Buchanan. Feel free to re-post this on blogs, websites etc.

Summary:
The truth about what happened to the World Trade Centre on 11 September 2001 was discovered by Dr Judy Wood, through careful research between 2001 and 2008. The author of this book, Andrew Johnson, had a “good view” of how later parts of Dr Wood’s research “came together.” Not only that, he was also involved in activities, correspondence and research which illustrated that this truth was being deliberately covered up. This book is a companion and follow-up volume to “9/11 Holding the Truth” – and documents ongoing (and successful) efforts to keep the truth out of the reach of most of the population.


Evidence in this book, gathered over a period of 12 years, shows that the cover up is “micro-managed,” internationally and even globally. The book names people who are involved in the cover up. It illustrates how they often stick to “talking points” and seem to have certain patterns of behaviour. It attempts to illustrate how difficult it is to prevent the truth from being marginalised, attacked and “muddled up.” Additionally, other evidence pertaining to the events of 9/11 is studied in an attempt to show the vast implications of what is now known. The book aims to open the reader’s mind to the power of the group or groups that perpetrated this enormous deception. At the same time, it is shown that the secrets revealed contain the knowledge for positively transforming the world we live in.

A brief video from Andrew Johnson talking about the his new book. 

 

To order the book or to download a "free" PDF version copy, please visit this page on Andrew Johnson's website: http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=463&Itemid=60  

Personal Message of Thanks to Andrew Johnson...
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Andrew Johnson for the inclusion of some of my research in his book. I am personally very humbled. Please consider reading the book to inform yourself of the new information that Andrew has included, following-on from his previous 2009 book. 

 
Thanks for reading and caring... 


 

Monday, 13 November 2017

Richard D. Hall & Andrew Johnson - Comparing Video & Radar Evidence on 9/11



During the 9/11 "attacks", the flight 175 "impact" was recorded by between 50 and 60 different video cameras, each having a different viewing perspective of the same event. Even though there are so many recordings of what happened, the evidence in these videos casts huge doubt over whether boeing 767s were used in the attacks. Other non video evidence also supports the "no planes" hypothesis. 

Andrew Johnson joins Richard D. Hall to discuss the 3D radar analysis evidence and the 9/11 video evidence. 








Please consider following my blogs by pressing the "Follow-Me" button in the side-bar to follow future blog articles. 


Thank you for watching and reading, and also thank you for caring!



Friday, 3 November 2017

September Clues - BUSTED! - By: Anthony Lawson - Nov 2007



By Mark Conlon

This is an excellent analysis of Simon Shack's film September Clues by the late Anthony Lawson, who made some great observations in relation to Simon Shack's presentation of "alleged" evidence of TV Fakery on 9/11. 

Disclaimer: I "disagree" with Anthony Lawson's final point he makes at the end of his video in relation to the "impossible plane speed" that a 767 Boeing plane can travel at 572mph at sea level.   

 
As we can see yet again, Simon Shack uses very deceptive means to present his evidence. This has been a common theme with Simon Shack throughout all his September Clues films, which can no-longer be trusted to present 9/11 video evidence in a fair and balanced objective manner. 

Simon Shack appears to lack any "real" credibility anymore, and has proved himself to be extremely poor at conducting research analysis, or he is simply setting-out to deceive his viewers of his films. 

What exactly is Simon Shack's mission? 
Is Simon Shack promoting the idea of ‘video fakery’ to discredit the video evidence record of 9/11? When studying Simon Shack’s presentation in his film, it becomes clear that he has continually omitted or misrepresented evidence – by using cleverly timed editing.  This has therefore concealed evidence which shows a number of his claims are false. From my past analysis, where I have disproven other claims he makes in his film, it is now appearing to be a deliberate pattern of deceptive and misleading behaviour, rather than poor research skills, suggesting an agenda to promote disinformation about the video record on 9/11. Is Simon Shack promoting the idea that ‘video fakery’ explains anomalies in the behaviour of Flight 175 when it crashes into the South Tower? Is Simon Shack attempting to discredit the 9/11 videos to help conceal what was really captured in the videos? Again, I ask the question - is Simon Shack disseminating disinformation in an attempt to hide the fact that advanced image projection technology was used to create the illusion of plane crashes?

Is Simon Shack is overseeing a "Psychological Operation" to promote ‘video fakery’ to lead people away from closely studying other explanations for the 9/11 video evidence. When people believe they have an explanation for the anomalies, it stops them studying the evidence any further.

This is a great analysis by the late Anthony Lawson. R.I.P, who really "BUSTED" Simon Shack along time ago and should be credited for his efforts to expose the "falsehoods" contained in Shack's film, although I completely "disagree" with Anthony Lawson's final point at the end of his video in relation to the "impossible plane speed" that a 767 Boeing plane can travel 572mph at sea level. I have posted his video purely on merit for the September Clues analysis.  
  
To find out more about Simon (Hytten) Shack and his mission and his unusual connections, read this article by Andrew Johnson:
9 or 11 “Clues” about Simon Shack and a 3D-Analysis of Flight 175


Thank you watching and caring!




Monday, 30 October 2017

Simon Shack's - Great Nose-In & Nose-Out Hoax - By: Anthony Lawson - Nov 2007


By: Mark Conlon

He is a short video made by the late Anthony Lawson, who made some great observations in relation to Simon Shack's presentation of evidence regardng the plane "nose-out" comparisons which Simon Shack produced in his September Clues film, to prove the nose of the plane exited the South Tower in the Fox News "Chopper 5" video footage.


As we can see Simon Shack has used a very deceptive way to present his evidence. This has been a common theme with Simon Shack and throughout all his September Clues films, which can no longer be trusted to present video evidence objectively. What is Simon Shack's mission? Great work by the late Anthony Lawson. R.I.P.

To find out more about Simon (Hytten) Shack and his mission, read this article by Andrew Johnson:  
9 or 11 “Clues” about Simon Shack and a 3D-Analysis of Flight 175


Thank you watching and caring!


  

Thursday, 26 October 2017

Simon Shack's "King Kong Man" in North Tower Window - DEBUNKED!

 

By Mark Conlon


In this blog I want to draw attention to a video posted at Steve De'ak's YouTube channel in 2015, where he admitted that he was wrong about his North Tower "Tiny Windows" theory. However the same cannot be said for Simon Shack with his "King Kong Man" in the window theory. 

The video below proves that it was not "video fakery" or people being giants or small windows in the video footage, or anything wrong with the video. Again it is down to perspectives and the angles, something that Simon Shack does NOT understand including parallax, as demonstrated in my previous blog artices. 

See below: Steve De'ak's apology video for his mistaken "Tiny Windows" theory 



See below: Simon Shack's comment to this video from Steve De'ak's YouTube channel.

  
While Steve De'ak shows humility for his mistake, Simon Shack reverted to using disrespectful names in his comment by calling people "clowns" and "goons" and would rather accuse people of being shills. 

Please note: Simon Shack doesn't say the video isn't wrong in its proof that it was not "video fakery", however would rather avoid that point by promoting another "false" video about an "alleged" 21-ft tall jumper video. 

This is classic avoidance by Simon (Hytten) Shack, which speaks volumes as to what Shack's role is by promoting "falsehoods" while accusing others of doing the same as he has been doing since 2007 in his films. I have been quite sceptical of Steve De'ak's points he has promoted in the past, but he has admitted his mistake in this case, and also about his "Frozen Smoke" theory in the Hezarkhani video. This is something that Simon Shack never does, which speaks volumes about his mission and goals to find the truth. 

To find out more about Simon (Hytten) Shack and his mission, read this article by Andrew Johnson:  
9 or 11 “Clues” about Simon Shack and a 3D-Analysis of Flight 175


Thank you for reading and caring!